Re: *** Augusti offtopic - Lõikuskuu toob suuremad kasumid ***
2+2 threadist.
Next Ivey?
Old 08-13-2009, 08:38 PM #1
Highlimit
newbie
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 28
200NL vs. 25/50NL
I have tried and tried to play 25nl and 50nl and constantly bust my online account. I never get up any. Usually start down and lose lose lose. I recently started playing 200NL and have had some moderate success. I seem to have more feel for the bigger bets and can take control of more pots. I don't have a big enough online BR yet but I don't understand the grinding mentality of the micro limits. It seems the micro limit is just a waste of time. The larger limit plays more like real poker. It seems saving up a bigger BR and starting at 200NL makes more sense. Do people really think the skill level is that different from micro to small? I have continued to buy short and win an entire BI. Usually buyin for $50 and cash out around $200+. I never could buy in at 25NL full and win even 3 times my buy in. I also don't seem to go on tilt as much at 200NL and play more TAG than at 25 or 50NL. I think I am playing more ABC poker. Does any of this make sense? I just started reading the forum and getting more serious about poker. Any help or suggestions are great.
Also:
I have played in my local 1/2 NL game for a couple of years and have always been a break even to small loser in the game. Since March of this year I have become a winning player. I think I am playing much tighter and more ABC. My goal is 5/10. is the skill level that much higher? I'm not going to jump right in but I will consider playing up to 400NL and taking some shots at 1000NL until I feel comfortable. Again am I blind?
2+2 threadist.
Next Ivey?
Old 08-13-2009, 08:38 PM #1
Highlimit
newbie
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 28
200NL vs. 25/50NL
I have tried and tried to play 25nl and 50nl and constantly bust my online account. I never get up any. Usually start down and lose lose lose. I recently started playing 200NL and have had some moderate success. I seem to have more feel for the bigger bets and can take control of more pots. I don't have a big enough online BR yet but I don't understand the grinding mentality of the micro limits. It seems the micro limit is just a waste of time. The larger limit plays more like real poker. It seems saving up a bigger BR and starting at 200NL makes more sense. Do people really think the skill level is that different from micro to small? I have continued to buy short and win an entire BI. Usually buyin for $50 and cash out around $200+. I never could buy in at 25NL full and win even 3 times my buy in. I also don't seem to go on tilt as much at 200NL and play more TAG than at 25 or 50NL. I think I am playing more ABC poker. Does any of this make sense? I just started reading the forum and getting more serious about poker. Any help or suggestions are great.
Also:
I have played in my local 1/2 NL game for a couple of years and have always been a break even to small loser in the game. Since March of this year I have become a winning player. I think I am playing much tighter and more ABC. My goal is 5/10. is the skill level that much higher? I'm not going to jump right in but I will consider playing up to 400NL and taking some shots at 1000NL until I feel comfortable. Again am I blind?
Comment